If Hillary Is The Moral Choice, I Question Your Morals.
One of the most unnerving lies the mainstream media and SJWs try to purport is that Hillary Clinton somehow has the moral high ground on Donald Trump.
“Racist!”, they exclaim for his (admittedly) blunt and over the top commentaries on illegal immigration.
“Sexist”, they continue for his comments on Rosie O’Donnell, Hillary and others in the perpetually protected sphere of femnazidom.
“Islamaphobe”, they yell for his comments on islam and his proposed 5 year immigration ban (until they “sort this thing out”).
They continue on and on ad-naseum, virtue signalling along the way, trying to villainize Donald for his brazen and unapologetic opinions. . .yet they purport Hillary as a “champion of female/LGBT communities”, “a strong leader” and laughably a somehow more “peaceful” alternative to Trump. To quote Mark Twain:
They’re full of utter horseshit!
– Mark Twain
Okay, Twain didn’t say that. But if you believe it, then you’re obviously gullible enough to believe any of those things about Hillary as well. So, if I can keep your attention for 5 minutes, let’s discuss why, shall we?
Champion of female/LGBT communities
Perhaps the most hilarious (no pun intended) statement you could possibly make. There is ample evidence to suggest that Hillary Clinton is the exact opposite of a “champion of women,” but in actuality could be called “a champion of rapists.” In the linked “Hillary Tapes”, Mrs. Clinton – who in 1975 was a swanky lawyer – defended a man accused of raping a 12 year old girl and later made light of it. The audio was taken from a Roy Reed interview in the 1980s that was recently unsurfaced from the University of Arkansas archives. Listen to it yourself. Hilary’s attitude towards the entire ordeal is rather lighthearted and to me, demeans the severity of the whole case. You can make up your own mind, but you should also take into account Hilary’s silence on the Muslim migrant sexual assaults in Cologne, Germany on New Years Eve of 2015 (undoubtedly an attempt to please her islamist allies) and her disgusting cooperation in blackmailing her husbands alleged assault victims.
If you need more convincing, then just look at the millions in Middle Eastern gulf oil state money that her and Bill have recieved over the years. Not exactly a “women’s champion”, considering the disgusting offenses towards women and minorities carried out by these countries.
To try and add the LGBT community(s) into the mix would be a disgrace as well, due to her notable flip-flopping on gay marriage, her failure to condemn said rich oil states (while taking upwards of 100 million dollars of their money for her and her husband Bill’s foundations) and her underwhelmingly soft reaction in the wake of the Orlando Massacre. It is worth noting too that Hillary Clinton has repeatedly expressed desire to bring in more muslim migrants, which could potentially pose a threat to the LGBT community as well given the track record of anti-gay sentiment/actions within that community. All of this lies in start contradiction of what she has said in regards to the LGBT community.
[Side note to the issue is that I have noticed from experience that a lot of LGBT people (more homosexual men then anyone else) are inclined to be fiscally conservative, yet vote Dem because of LGBT issues. To me, this could potentially be a huge thorn in the side of Hillary, as Trump has proven to be just as tolerant to the LGBT community, yet twice as fiscally conservative. From personal observation, my homosexual male friends express desire to retain their money and under a Hillary presidency, many would have reason to fear their tax contributions increase (for no reason at all, given that Trump supports them just as much as Hillary).]
Strong Leader
How much leadership or strength is exemplified in trying to compare Vladmir Putin to Hitler or brand him as the biggest threat to the US (as she alluded to in the debates)? If anything, it is rather cowardly to do so given that Putin has been the UN/EU/globalist/SJW punching bag for over 10 years now. Couple sentiment this with the fact that Russian/US relations are unstable as it is and you have a recipe for disaster should she become president. Not only is it cowardly to have such an attitude, it’s dangerous cowardice! It shows a massive lack of leadership because a true leader would not want to intensify sentiment with a country that could be a very important ally to the west. Yet in order to please George Soros and the other globalists, she instead tries to demonize Putin for challenging globalist motives.
Let me state for the record that I am not justifying Putin for the conflict in Ukraine (yet I’m not demonizing him for it either given the complexity of the conflict); however, it’s too convenient for Hilary to condemn Putin for Ukraine, yet remain completely moot about her role in the “Arab Spring” , which eventually lead to one of the most disasterous migrant crisises to ever hit the west.
With that considered, two other glaring examples of her ineptitude have to be Benghazi and the private server scandal. These have been discussed ad-naseum, so I don’t believe that I have to provide any links as they are readily available with a simple google search. Common sense tells me that such an aggregious violation alone merits that she not be in the white house, yet the media (as much as they fail) continually tries to sweep these scandals under the rug as if they lacks some type of importance.
Peaceful Alternative
Are they mental? I see nothing that leads me to believe she is peaceful, especially considering her role in the “Arab Spring” and her role in the Lybian Civil War. Not to mention voting in favor of the Iraq war.
Hilary’s resume as potential “warmonger and chief” is evident. As a result of the “Arab Spring” and her actions in Lybia, a region is now destabilized and those fleeing said countries are dying in an attempted to flood Europe and in many cases, causing heaps of chaos in Europe upon arrival (not all of them, but good handfulls).
I wanted to provide an exact number of the casualties in Lybia, however the information varies from source to source on account of no government or international organization being able to keep tabs on such a statistic. From what I have gathered though, conservative estimates range from 4,000 – 30,000 depending on who you read (with some lower and some higher). If we keep in mind that there were 4,000 – 30,000 deaths due in great part to Hilary’s negligence, that is still 4,000 – 30,000 more dead on her account than that of Donald Trump.
Recap for those keeping score:
Deaths caused by irresponsible policies
Clinton – 4k-30k
Trump – 0
So there you have it. Trump may offend butthurt liberals at times and be blunt about what he thinks – but he’s never covered up a sex scandal, he’s never destabilized a region and he has no blood on his hands because of irresponsible meddling with conflicts in Middle East.
Take a second and ask yourself what is worse: Someone proposing that we *gasp* enforce our current immigration laws or someone who has a HUGE hand in flooding Europe with migrants (even with potential Jidhadis in the mix), intimidated the hell out of her husbands alleged victims, has US marine blood on her hands and is greatly responsible for the death of thousands in the Middle Eastern/Africa as a result of her calls for military intervention in the region. . .
Irresponsibility. . .or “bad words”?
Seriously, what is worse?
“Bad words” or assault, death and criminal activity?
And if it’s not, then maybe it isn’t Trump/Trump supporters who need a moralty check, it’s Hillary and hers.
Many people on the left want to virtue signal, but what good are virtues if you actively and knowingly support someone who has no virtue in reality, yet condemn someone who you think has no virtue in theory?